By Pauline Masson –
A number of downtown business owners are unhappy with aldermen according to two local business owners who launched a tsunami of complaint against the board of aldermen Tuesday evening for not giving them the respect they feel they deserve.
Ann Trent, president and CEO of Bigfoot 4×4 and Jenifer Blakely owner/operator of the Cigar Vault and The Landing Airbnb each identified the downtown business district, the Pacific Partnership and the City Tourism Commission as being unhappy with the board of aldermen and calling for change.
They want more respect and they want the aldermen to personally pitch in on their promotional events.
It was not possible to see on YouTube how many individuals accompanied the speakers but a hardy round of applause could be heard as each concluded their speech.
I have to tell you . . . this was painful to watch. I have witnessed a lot of things said at city board meetings that should not have been said in that setting, but this hate rally against those elected to serve all the citizens — all the citizen — was the most demoralizing thing I’ve seen in my time as a reporter here.
Ms. Trent said members of Business community feel that they were not getting the support that they should, especially as important members of the Pacific community.
“While it is true that some of us cannot vote, we employ thousands of persons, pay taxes and license fees and contribute items and cash to public events,” she said.
“The last 30 years of my life I have been working in marketing. Bigfoot is one of the five biggest marketing vehicles of all time,” Ms.Trent said. “My entire business is marketing. That’s what we do. How we get noticed. That’s what all our job is.”
All due respect to Bigfoot. We all love Bigfoot. We are all happy that Bigfoot chose to move its headquarters to Pacific. But it’s a fairy tale to compare this giant example of Americana – grown over 40 years – with the all the products and services that Pacific businesses offer.
Ms. Trent wasn’t finished.
“I must tell you that when this board recently seem to laugh at our efforts, that our time and effort wasn’t even appreciated, not only was it demoralizing, to be frank it was extremely rude,” she said.
I’m not aware of who laughed, or when, but we’re all grown-ups here. Aldermen are not elected to serve one segment of the population. We need to have public conversations about the needs in all the business districts, all the people, and how we can help aldermen to fill those needs.
Ms. Blakely began her presentation with the acknowledgement that businesses and residents may have different needs.
“I’ve met this week with a number of business owners, and after having conversations with them and the residence I’ve come to the conclusion that my needs as a resident are not the same as my needs as a business owner. And unfortunately you are the alderman for both of those groups,” she said.
She went on to say that it is the business district that deserves the action of the aldermen.
“The mayor was correct when she said it (the swimming pool) was a ‘want’ not a ‘need.’ That is a fact. Our city is not in a position to invest in something that is going to lose money at this time. There are people who say we have a feral cat problem. I don’t feed them I don’t see them,” she said. “But I do believe that putting money in a feral cat program and a broken pool are going to have a negative impact. Especially when you take that money from things that move Pacific Forward,” – like tourism, which happens to be the business she is in.
“We need our alderman to build relationships with local businesses,” she said. “Relationships can make a difference. It can be the difference between success and failure.”
The notion that aldermen should provide funds and respect to downtown businesses to the exclusion of people who want a swimming pool or people who worry about feral cat goes against every tenet of good government.
“We also would like to see our alderman at events, the open house, city wide cleanup day, the car show, working alongside us to help make these events succeed,” Ms. Blakely said.
I frankly would rather see them hold more committee meetings with experts to iron out the needs at the swimming pool, the entire parks, traffic and the need to increase our police department.
Our aldermen are not elected to promote a single business district such a downtown or a single business. We elect our aldermen to spread their time, energy and city funds to the benefit of the entire population – the big businesses in the industrial park who want good traffic, the parents with families that need the necessary recreation for the growth and health of their children, the will of the residents to support our city even when everyone does not get their wishes, the people who are caught up in unfriendly water bill up-charges. We need a larger police department.
I can understand Partnership Committee members wanting to see aldermen glad handing at the car show or open houses, but the reality is Aldermen are elected to manage the business of the city, not the businesses of Tourism Commission or Partnership volunteers.
Ms. Blakely was upset because of what she described as “the Klance mess.” But from where I sit, Klance Staging received the favorable zoning to park its trucks at the entrance to one of city parks because officials kept reminding each other of Klance’s generosity to the city in providing the bleachers.
The Tourism Commission, Pacific Partnership and downtown business community have undoubtedly created good and supportive relationships with each other. Good for them. The goal now might be to work on their relationship with the aldermen. For people who lay claim to their great promotional skills, war with the aldermen seems counter productive.
If there ever was an ideal time to create strong relationships among city officials, businesses, marketing experts and town boosters it is now when we could pool our best efforts to craft attractions that would lure Route 66 centennial motorists off the mother road to spend time and money in Pacific
If the downtown businesses coalition wants credit for their public events, they should have it. Pacific residents turn out for car shows, fairs, farmers’ markets, festivals, open houses, parades, rodeos, and even street sales. We love these events and compliment the Partnership and Tourism Commission for their good work. We have other work for the aldermen to do.
In the words of basketball great Charles Barkley – “I may be wrong. But I doubt it.”
Pauline,
As always, you are so off base with your continuous remarks as far as the alderman are concerned. Why wouldn’t you want your elected officials not only glad handing, as you so elegantly state it, but actually helping out with organizing and making sure that our events run smoothly!
I have not seen 1 alderperson in the last 25 years even attempted to help out with such events. But, they will sit back and criticise what they feel could have been a more successful event.
I, for one, am so tired of they’re continuous effort to try and hold up efforts to make our community a better place to live and work, making Pacific a quality of life environment.
You should expect the same, but you continue to stick your nose into, not only government business, but retail business, which you clearly have no clue in.
Even when you were the reporter for the city’s portion of the Missouri an, you tried your damndest to direct our elected officials into your own personal agenda.
You just need to go away!
Please stop with your efforts to try to pursuade others into your libtard ways of thinking.
I will never sway my ways for yours.
These current city officials may applause your inciteful words, that they think are backing them up in they’re attempt to tear down our society, but We the People will always come out on top eventually!
Sincerely
Loyd Harris
Loyd, did you happen to watch the special BOA meeting where the Alderman were demanding action on the pool from City employees? I’d say that’s an attempt to make this a better community for the Citizens.
I didn’t vote for the Mayor and Alderman based on the PR they do, I voted for them to be good stewards of my tax dollars and make sure our City business is run well.
It’s great if commercial business in our town is successful but that’s not the job or mandate of elected City Officials. It is thier job to vote on ordinances and policies that foster an environment that’s hospitable for business to thrive.
The recent Candlewick debate is a perfect example of our elected officials trying to make the best possible policies for both business and citizens to thrive and work together.
A safe, clean community with good city services and infrastructure is what City Government is elected to do – the tax paying citizens are not really worried about the Alderman working on behalf of privately owned, for profit, commercial enterprises – they need to handle marketing themselves, with the Chamber and Partnership.
Sticks and stones, Loyd.
You’re right on one point. As a 50-year journalist, I have a take on city government and when things go really wrong I feel compelled to say it out loud.
When two appointed city commission members publicly dress down the elected officials like imperious schoolmarms, they have my attention.
Ann Trent’s and Jennifer Blakely’s petitions at the July 2 board of aldermen meeting were shocking. If they intended to shock anyone, they succeeded. If they wanted to persuade the elected officials to their point of view, I’m afraid they missed the mark.
Ms. Trent and Ms. Blakely are authorized, as legally seated members of the tourism commission, to help determine the best way to spend the tourism taxes collected by local hotels, motels, etc. by making recommendations to the board of aldermen. The aldermen must approve, not only the tourism commission’s annual budget, but every expenditure – every check that is written.
I think they are successful business operators. I admire their businesses and believe that Bigfoot, the Cigar Vault and the Landing Hub enhance Pacific’s image.
The businesses that they operate qualify them to serve on the tourism commissiom. But no matter how much we like those busnesses, being successful business owners does not qualify them to run the city.
They each touted their personal motives as working to do what was best for the city but were unable or unwilling to attribute any good motives to the aldermen. Ms. Blakely touted the importance of building relationships to create a better city. If they truly want to build relationships they could start with the aldermen.
And because of my views on all this you want me to go away? . . . Really, Loyd. . . . If everyone who disagreed with you went away what would happen to our tax base?
Pauline:
We are meeting on Monday, July 8th in the Opera House to present and discuss an effort to
brand the City Center and advance some rather progressive ideas. You have always been a
compelling voice of support for the Opera House and downtown businesses and we hope you will join us at 3:00 pm on Monday. I have been wanting to call you but haven’t been able to find your phone number. Would appreciate a call…314-265-9982
Hope you and Bob are doing well.
Best regards
Jim McHugh
Pauline:
Just a note about the meeting on Monday afternoon and the branding of City Central.
We have been meeting every Sunday afternoon for the last few months to develop a strategy
to bring foot traffic to the retail businesses on St Louis Street and First Street. We identified City Central as a two block radius from the City Clock, two blocks in all directions.
I will share the minuets of our meeting with you and the status of the projects that that we
are initiating. We invited many to our meetings but few have chosen, but those that have been participated are the citizens of action and the ones who make things happen anyway.
Thanks for you continued interest and support
Jim McHugh – Opera House of Pacific