Homeless in Pacific / Police Chief’s Call to Criminalize Homeless Raises Alarm Bells

Photo of Woods near Baltimore – Apparently homeless are sheltering in wood in Pacific as well.

By Pauline Masson –

Police Chief Scott Melies is trying to convince Pacific aldermen to make it illegal for anyone to reside in housing not connected to city water and sewers in Pacific. No tents, campers, RVs,  etc.  He is so invested in his view that he forcefully debated the issue with aldermen during an aldermanic discussion at the Sept. 7 meeting.

Make no mistake, the chief went beyond offering his professional view and pushed back repeatedly – arguing his position – when aldermen voiced opinions that property owners should be allowed use RVs on their property under certain circumstances.

The chief said he wants to “go after” property owners who now allow people to live temporarily on their property. He said Pacific has a serious transient issue of people unsheltered in our town and he and others in the police department want a strict ordinance that they can enforce. When aldermen decided to refer the issue to an aldermanic committee meeting, the chief said he wanted to attend the meeting, to have a say and offer insight on what his department is trying to do with this ordinance.

This focus on homeless in Pacific has set off resounding alarm bells for me.

For the past seven years I have championed the homeless families of our community, which, at first, focused on their children’s school life and needs and later grew to the needs of the entire family.

When I first learned in 2016 that there were seven homeless students enrolled in the MVR-III school district, I was stunned – stunned to learn that we had any homeless people living in Pacific. 

Dan McClain and I formed the Safety Net Committee and petitioned our circle of friends for donations to meet any needs that these students might have. We partnered with the MVR-III school district to dispense the funds because the district had the capacity to identify the homeless students and monitor their needs. We were quickly joined by Mary Beth Schmidt, a nurse with the F.C. Health Department and part owner of Pacific Care Center and Alderman Carol Johnson, who said they wanted to help look after the homeless students and their families.

To our surprise, the number of individuals that qualified as homeless grew to the hundreds.

During the Meramec River floods of 2015 and 2017, scores of families and hundreds of students were forced to vacate their flooded homes. It never occurred to anyone that they were not part of the community. As the flood water swirled, parents went to work and kids went to school. For the first several days after each flood, victims could find cots for sleeping, a washer and dryer to do their laundry, three meals a day and even dry clothes at the Tri-County Senior Center, which had been established as a Red Cross Emergency Shelter in 2015.

When the Red Cross deemed that the emergency was over and closed the shelter, flood victims had to find temporary dwelling as they faced the reality of their damaged homes. They were homeless. 

Families scrambled to restart their lives. They doubled up with relatives, living in spare rooms or basements, found temporary dwelling in rental apartments or trailers – or maybe less dependable housing, which the chief would consider illegal. They went about their lives and, except for their close relatives and friends, most of us assumed they were getting on.

Some of these families were faced with paying mortgages on their flooded property as they rented temporary living space. Some are still struggling to rebuild their lives after the loss of their homes and all their worldly goods. With COVID and the loss of jobs, the needs of families, many still struggling from the floods, compounded. 

Safety Net has provided temporary housing for families, paid for after school child care, distributed food cards that provided meals in local restaurants, winter clothing and transportation. At its most startling Safety Net assisted two single mothers who were sleeping in their cars with small children – in winter. 

After raising tens of thousands of dollars from within our community and helping countless families thrive in less than favorable conditions, Safety Net has grown into a service organization that reaches into every segment of the community – 50 individuals, seven churches and two civic groups have donated funds to help Safety Net to help the homeless. I have to believe that our community would try to help any homeless residents who want to be helped.

The police department focus on the homeless is particularly troubling because the police chief has targeted homeless people as a semi criminal element that would face fines and jail time for their substandard housing conditions.

We need to slow this campaign to kick the homeless out of our community until we determine who they are and what harm they have done.

Let’s be clear, I am not condoning any criminal activity. Any individual who steals, threatens or intimidates other individuals, burglarizes property or even trespasses should be detained by the police and face consequences. But to target all homeless people – and even visitors living in travel trailers on relatives property – as undesirable, goes a bridge too far.

While aldermen are considering traffic studies and surface water studies, let’s have a study of homeless people in our community – a real study that goes beyond the  single purpose view of a police chief, whose primary mandate is enforcing the law and preventing crime.

The chief has to do his job. Some readers will recall that I lobbied so hard for the elected chief to be able to do his job without interference from other government officials that I was kicked off my much loved history committee. But my belief in the rule of law comes first.

And the branch of government that makes the laws that serve the entire community is the board of aldermen – not the police. I am lobbying now for the alderman to look at the big picture here and come up with a law that reflects the heart and the will of the community.

Author: paulinemasson

Pauline Masson, editor/publisher.

8 thoughts on “Homeless in Pacific / Police Chief’s Call to Criminalize Homeless Raises Alarm Bells”

  1. Merrick Felder says:

    Wonderful thoughts, Pauline. And even better, action. Would you please send me a link for donations to the Safety Net Committee?

  2. Becky Reed says:

    Dear Pauline,
    I just finished reading you article about the homeless in Pacific. We have a few who join us at Pacific Presbyterian Church on Thursday for Dinner With Us. Where and how can we bring a meal to these people? Our church mission is that no one is hungry.

  3. Guy Husereau says:

    Thank you for putting light on this issue.The chief should enforce laws, not draft laws.

  4. Donald Cummings says:

    Pauline I have lived here in Peoria Illinois for over 30 years, the city where I was born. Our population is a little over 110 Thousand. We have hundreds of homeless people in our City. I understand the awkwardness of looking at homeless people but they are people regardless how they look. The Chief whom I support is attacking this as a plague because he doesn’t know what to about it. He isn’t supposed to know, the Board of Aldermen legislate policy. They need to find a solution for this problem but without violating land owner’s constitutional rights in the process. Chief put down your sledge hammer 🔨 and pick up a Bible. What you do to the least of these you have done it to me. Matthew Chapter 25 vs 40.

  5. Kaeti says:

    Thank you for bringing light to this Pauline! Much needed and agree.

  6. Henry says:

    The Chief is searching for ‘ghosts and goblins’ to blame for his lack of reducing petty crime in Pacific. If the homeless are the ‘problem’, intimidation of home owners and tax payers is not a solution that will not sit well with the voters. He should realize that if the other two marshal candidates would have compromised and chose one to run, he would have been out the door by a large margin. Remember there exists such a thing as a ‘recall election’, not so hard to get the required signatures when the citizens are angry.
    At the Operations Committee meeting where his proposal might be discussed, he should be treated like any other citizen; limited to five minutes with NO back and forth discussion. He should be allowed to present a written proposal, but NO back door ‘secret’ staff meetings.
    He is an “employee” by the employee had book.
    There must be separation of powers and the Board should vote the will of the citizens and not their personal feelings and not the wants of the Chief just because he thinks this is a needed ordinance.
    On a side note, what does he propose to do with these hardened criminals? He can’t hold them without bail, and for such ordinance offenses he can’t charge bail, only assign a court date. How are poor people to pay a fine if one is levied?
    Maybe he could rehab our unused jail and sparsely used council room into a temporary shelter. Then seek out help from the many help groups around the area.
    Now to discuss his idea of fining or charging homeowners who have the right to use their property. Does he plan on sending in some elite special ‘land clearing squad’ to enter private property in order to remove the people and such uninhabitable offending structures ( dought if he evens tries to get a warrant)?
    One last point, what if they all move just outside the city limits, does he think Franklin County is going to send in the troops?

  7. Miranda says:

    I just would like to say not every homeless person is a criminal. Some actually have steady jobs. Trying to do the best they can each and everyday, working for better future better days heck a better hr. They cry like you they are lost, unsure, worried about weather it’s going to storm where would they seek shelter. Instead of down grading them making things worse for them/on them. Why can’t we try and use one of these abandoned buildings and open a little shelter or something. I mean I ain’t no one but I used to be one of them homeless people.

  8. Henry says:

    A homeless shelter would most likely be a non-profit and not pay real state taxes. Sorry, but ain’t no way in this ‘hot town’ will that fly with the City Fathers. But it would be a good start as long as the many ‘do good’er groups’ are allowed to help with out interference from those at City Hall that wouldn’t like it because it was not their idea.

Comments are closed.